Search for: "Richard Edward Frye"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Richard Meyer and Robert N. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
Mahle, The “Pure Opinion” Exception to the Florida Frye Standard, Fla. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Back in 1993, in a cranky opinion piece – in a law review – then Judge Richard A. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Glenn Cohen CohenProf Harvard Julie Cohen julie17usc Georgetown David Cole DavidColeGtown Georgetown James Coleman energylawprf Calgary Jennifer Collins jmcollinsSMULaw SMU Richard Collins DrRichCollins Univ College Dublin Sutherland James P. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Arthur Frank Jumps the Gate Although ostensibly a “Frye” state, Pennsylvania judges have, when moved by the occasion, to apply a fairly thorough analysis of proffered expert witness opinion.[8] On occasion, Pennsylvania judges have excluded unreliably or invalidly supported causation opinions, under the Pennsylvania version of the Frye standard. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Charlestown, MA; Richard Gray, President) Blessed Travel Plus Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Saugus, MA; Richard Ireton, President) Bena Corporation (Peabody, MA; Vjollca Bena, President) Benoit & Mccarthy Photography, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
., Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and RICHARD ANGELOTTI and EDWARD ROSENBERG, Appellees. 2nd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Error to dismiss complaint as sanction for attorney's willful failure to comply with court order without considering all factors set forth in Kozel v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin & Edward J. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
